There is no easy answer Mark and any determination of negligence will be made after the fact by a group of people who may not recognise common sense, by then it is all too late.
Several times on outings I have seen fellow photographers knock over their tripod. Imagine if an SLR camera were to fall, hit and injure a child in such circumstance.
Who would the courts hold responsible..... the child or the photographer?
Private insurance is very expensive however the group cover offered by the state federation is quite cheap.
Don't get me wrong, I despise the way the legal system and insurance companies work, however for a few dollars a year I would prefer not to have to worry about the consequences should the unforseen occur.
A few camera's, a few glass thingy's on the front and a whole lot of photographic passion.....
If you need help on the site then just ask in a post, email or PM an Administrator or Moderator.